You're certainly entitled to give your two cents worth.
I'll be the first person to admit when I'm wrong, and this time I was wrong. I certainly did not accuse her in the community, nor would I have, but I did believe it was her.
As for the WL stuff, I have my opinion, you have yours. We don't agree.
I will say there's a difference in being frank and being mean when criticizing a person's work-- most particularly for an anonymous fest where the author/artist has no ability to defend themselves. What she said at WL and Smutty_claus wasn't frank, it was mean. I've never, in all the fests in which I've written, seen someone call someone's work complete rubbish or the worst piece of shit they've ever seen. She did that, and it was a terribly nasty thing to do.
However, back to the original purpose of my reply. It clearly was not Deadwoodpecker who posted the anonymous comment in question. I apologize for assuming that it was. I do apologize when I'm wrong. This time, I was.
no subject
I'll be the first person to admit when I'm wrong, and this time I was wrong. I certainly did not accuse her in the community, nor would I have, but I did believe it was her.
As for the WL stuff, I have my opinion, you have yours. We don't agree.
I will say there's a difference in being frank and being mean when criticizing a person's work-- most particularly for an anonymous fest where the author/artist has no ability to defend themselves. What she said at WL and Smutty_claus wasn't frank, it was mean. I've never, in all the fests in which I've written, seen someone call someone's work complete rubbish or the worst piece of shit they've ever seen. She did that, and it was a terribly nasty thing to do.
However, back to the original purpose of my reply. It clearly was not Deadwoodpecker who posted the anonymous comment in question. I apologize for assuming that it was. I do apologize when I'm wrong. This time, I was.